On April 18, 1942, eighty men embarked on one of the most extraordinary and daring air raids in American History. Undoubtedly, most historians view the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo as an example of bravery and ingenuity present in the United States military during World War II.  As General Doolittle remarked, “I was proud of my crew and all the other volunteers who were willing to lay their lives on the line for a risky mission that I could not tell them about until we were on the carrier.”   Although the bravery and heroism of the mission leaves no doubt, there is a great deal of debate regarding the success and impact of the mission. Most histories of the Doolittle Raid credit the mission with raising American morale, lowering Japanese morale and confidence, and precipitating the Battle of Midway, which the Japanese lost.  The difference between these histories rests with the emphasis the historian places on each positive consequence of the raid, and the extent to which the historian acknowledges the negative results of the raid.  Carroll Glines, the most distinguished scholar of the Doolittle Raid, argues that the psychological effect on the Japanese public and military was the most important result of the mission. James Merrill and others make a case that the rise in American morale was the most important part of the mission. The final group of historians question the true success of the Doolittle Raid. They weigh its positives against its negatives in alerting the Japanese and causing thousands of deaths to the Chinese.  In all, the historiography of the Doolittle Raid starts with the foundation set by Carroll Glines. Historians researching the
Doolittle Raid, begin their research by analyzing the psychological effects of the mission.  Although not explicitly aimed at explaining the Doolittle Raid, John Dower sheds light
 
on America’s anger and need for revenge against the Japanese.  Dower’s research combined with Merrill’s history provides a great base for the thesis of this paper.  The Doolittle Raid relieved America’s strong desire for revenge and provided a significant morale boost that pushed the United States to victory in the Pacific.
     Carroll Glines is the foremost scholar on the Doolitle Raid and has spent much of his life writing books related to the topic. A World War II veteran himself, Glines hails the raid as an important part of American victory in the Pacific. Glines’s most prominent work, Doolittle’s Tokyo Raiders, was the first comprehensive and analytical book written solely on the Tokyo Raid. This 1964 book made Glines’ interpretation fundamental to researching and analyzing the Doolittle Raid. Glines emphasizes the psychological impact the raid had on the entire country of Japan.  He states, “the impact on Japanese morale, the primary objective of the raid, was considerable.”   In his view, the Doolittle Raid completely changed the mindset of the Japanese people. Before the war, they were confident in their leadership and safety of their homeland.  The Japanese believed they could defeat America as they continued to hear about the victories of their military.  From Pearl Harbor onward, the Japanese continued to dominate without any strong display of Allied resistance.   After the Tokyo Raid, “The psychological effect was a creeping, insidious realization that, in spite of propaganda to the contrary, the confidence of the people was severely shaken.”   Doubt began to enter their minds, and they lost
confidence in their government and military.  The Japanese government recognized the negative effect this could have, and continued to produce propaganda that would alter the impact of the raid.   The military leaders also experienced the negative psychological effects of the Doolittle Raid. In Doolittle’s Tokyo Raiders, Glines points out the anger and shock the raid caused to Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto and other leaders.  As a direct result of the Doolittle Raid, Yamamoto moved to take possession of Midway Islands and secure the Japanese position in the Pacific.  This raid proved to be disastrous for the Japanese and was a major turning point in the war.
     Glines’ analysis of the Doolittle Raid’s psychological effects has remained constant throughout his works.  In his 1984 book, The Doolittle Raid: America’s Daring First Strike Against Japan, Glines continues to focus on the negative psychological effects of the raid on the Japanese citizens and leaders. Using much of the same language from his 1964 book, Glines adds a little emphasis to the immediate effect of the Doolittle Raid on the Japanese government. In the philosophy of the Japanese government, losing credibility to the public was a catastrophe.  Glines sums up his place in the Doolittle Raid historiography by stating, “the psychological after-effects and the fact that the Battle of Midway might not have been fought except for the Doolittle raid are the real reasons this single air raid has become a legend and deserves to be remembered.”  Glines focuses on the psychological effects because he believes that is the most important impact of the
Doolittle Raid. Little physical damage resulted from the Tokyo Raid, but the
psychological damage on the Japanese led them to a decisive defeat in the Pacific.
Glines’ emphasis on the psychological effects of the raid has pushed other historians to
 
begin their research in this area.
     Many other scholars have continued in Glines’ footsteps in writing about the Doolittle Raid.  Duane Schultz, John Keegan, and Janusz Piskalkiewicz have focused their history on the raid’s impact in changing the course of the war.  They have concentrated on the raid’s psychological impact on Japanese military leaders in persuading them to initiate the Battle of Midway. These historians base their ideas on Gline’s foundation, and continue to support his arguments. Although Schultz, Keegan, and Piskalkiewicz place little emphasis on the Japanese citizen, they follow Glines’ analysis that the Doolittle Raid forced the Japanese into a decisive defeat in the Pacific.  Duane Schultz examines Admiral Yamamoto and his personal sense of failure, by quoting Yamamoto’s biographer. Yamamoto’s “normally clear judgment was warped by the Doolittle Raid.”  Everything Yamamoto was assigned to protect seemed to have been destroyed.  This created a sense of urgency for Yamamoto to increase Japan’s defensive capabilities. Schultz argues that this led Yamamoto to prematurely push for the battle of Midway, which was a pivotal and decisive battle in the War in the Pacific.   Like most scholars, Schultz acknowledges other effects of the Doolittle Raid, including the boost it provided for American morale.   However, Schultz makes very clear in his introductory summary that the primary success of the Doolittle Raid was the psychological blow it provided to the military leaders of Japan. This blow caused the course of the war to be forever altered
in the Battle of Midway.  Like many scholars writing about the Doolittle Raid,
Schultz bases his interpretations on the foundation established by Carroll Glines.
     John Keegan agrees with this interpretation and states that the Doolittle Raid “might have been judged a fiasco if it had not registered with the Japanese high command.”  Keegan dismisses the psychological effect on the Japanese citizens and emphasizes the influence the Doolittle Raid had in pushing the Japanese high command to “provoke a decisive battle” at Midway Island.    Although the Doolittle Raid was not the only reason Japan moved to Midway, Keegan writes that it was an important factor in turning the tides of war in the Pacific.  Janusz Piekalkiewicz also emphasizes the psychological effect the Doolittle Raid had on Japanese military leaders.  Piekalkiewicz states that the raid scared the Japanese high command and caused them to focus more on defending their homeland. In his view, the raid was extremely important in causing Japan to bring forces back to protect their homeland and to set a date for the Battle of Midway.   Carroll Glines was extremely influential in emphasizing the psychological effects the Doolittle Raid had on Japanese citizens and high command.  His research and history has helped to solidify the importance of the Doolittle Raid in changing the course of war. Many other historians have followed in his footsteps and have further outlined the importance of the Doolittle Raid in precipitating the Battle of Midway. Although some historian’s have questioned the strength of this connection, most historians acknowledge that the Doolittle Raid had some effect in causing this important naval battle.
     Other historians have argued that the main success of the Doolittle Raid was its ability to raise American morale in a time of need.  The pioneer and leader of this philosophy is James Merrill.  Merrill writes about the many other accomplishments of the Tokyo Raid, but focuses on its significance in providing good news to Americans and shifting the momentum of war in the Pacific. Like Glines, Merrill emphasizes the psychological effects of the raid.  In his 1964 book Target Tokyo, Merrill discusses the barrage of negative news following Pearl Harbor.  The numerous problems caused Americans to become concerned about their military strength in the Pacific.   Merrill connects the negative news for the allies and the United States, to a strong need for something good to happen.  As military defeats continued to take place, this need grew in urgency and importance.  Merrill states that public “concern intensified by the death of the British battleships Prince of Wales and Repulse off Malaya in the Gulf of Siam.”   In Merrill’s interpretation, the most influential impact of the Doolittle Raid was its success in breaking this string of bad news and setbacks.  It created an end to American military problems and started a large string of successes in the war against Japan.  Momentum shifted, morale soared, and the United States used the Doolittle Raid to push for further success.  Merrill writes. “The Eighteenth of April, like a false dawn, held the promise of eventual victory in the Pacific.”  Americans sensed this promise and gained an increased confidence in their military and ability to achieve victory.
     Other historians have also followed in Merrill’s interpretation of the Doolittle Raid.  Although C.L. Sulzberger and B.H. Liddell Hart write more general histories of World
War II, they still argue that the most important result of the Doolittle Raid was the lift it provided to American morale and confidence. Written after 1964, these histories continue in Glines’ lead and focus on the psychological effects of the raid.  However, they support Merrill’s argument that the greatest psychological impact was with the Americans. Sulzberger also emphasizes the bad news and failures of the American military in the first months of the war. The first part of 1942 offered little hope and encouragement for the American public, with news of the U-boats sinkings, defeat in Luzon, and the destruction of large parts of the allied fleets.   Sulzberger states, “It was clearly necessary for Americans to prove to themselves that they were capable of hitting back, and to prove to the Japanese that they would suffer for their imprudence.”   The Doolittle Raid offered this proof to the American public and military.  Although Sulzberger writes that the Doolittle Raid did not directly change the course of war, he concludes that it provided an important psychological lift to Americans.   In his book, History of the Second World War, B.H. Liddell Hart credits the Doolittle Raid with significantly raising American morale, and forcing Japan to concentrate more on the defense of their country and surrounding islands.  Even so, Liddell Hart writes, “The prime result of the raid was the fillip it gave to American morale, which had been badly shaken by Pearl Harbor.”  This raid gave the United States a lift and provided momentum for the rest of the war.  Liddell Hart writes only two pages about the Doolittle Raid in his seven hundred-page history of World War II. Despite this, Liddell Hart describes the Tokyo Raid as one part of the puzzle that changed the course of war for the Americans and Allies.  Merrill, Sulzberger,
and Liddell Hart all argue that the most important effect of the Doolittle Raid was the psychological boost it provided to American momentum, confidence, and morale.  This view on the Doolittle Raid remains an influential part of its historiography.
     Although most historians recognize the successes of the Doolittle Raid, many also acknowledge the negative effects of the raid.  Even Glines, the most glorifying historian of the raid, recognizes the devastating after effects on the Chinese.  In Doolittle’s Tokyo Raiders, Glines includes a chapter entitled “The Chinese Help…And Suffer the Consequences.” This chapter describes the horrific punishments and deaths the Japanese inflicted on the Chinese for helping the Doolittle Raiders.  In one account, the Japanese captured the man who had harbored Lieutenant Watson, “wrapped him up in some blankets, poured the oil of the lamp on him and obliged his wife to set fire to the human torch.”  Glines includes this example to show the swift and horrific revenge the Japanese pursued as a result of the Doolittle Raid.  This shows that the impact of the Doolittle Raid was not all positive.  In his 1984 book, Glines provides even more details and statistics regarding the plight of the Chinese. He uses Chiang Kai Shek’s statements, government records, and General Claire Chennault’s observations, to portray the cruel three-month campaign that claimed the lives of approximately two hundred fifty thousand Chinese.  Many innocent people were killed, and Glines recognizes that it was an effect of the Doolittle Raid. In examining the Doolittle Raid, Glines says that “it is the aftermath of Japanese terror and brutality, which has few equals in modern military history, that
provides a reminder for all of man’s capacity for all of man’s capacity for cruelty to his fellow man.”  Even so, he blames the Japanese, and still credits the Doolittle Raid as an integral part of American victory in the Pacific.
     Other historians weigh the negative effects of the Doolittle Raid more heavily. Donald Miller strongly considers the negative effects of the raid in his history of World War II. Although Miller credits the raid with raising American morale, he discusses the executions of three Americans and the death of a quarter million Chinese.   He links these deaths to the Doolittle Raid and questions whether we should really consider it a success.  Miller never explicitly states his opinion of the Doolittle Raid, but infers that it created more harm than success.  In Samuel Eliot Morison’s book, Strategy and Compromise, he portrays the Doolittle Raid as “spectacular”, but with little real impact on the war.   In other words, it was a show of bravery that was not strategically significance in the grand scheme of World War II.  Morison continues to write that the raid “probably did us more harm, by putting the enemy on his guard, than it did us good in lessons learned.”  In this statement, Morison directly refutes the notions of Glines and other scholars who claim that an important effect of the raid was to make Japan more defensive.  Similar to Glines, Miller and Morison acknowledge the negative effects of the Doolittle Raid.  In contrast, they emphasize these effects more heavily and infer that the Tokyo Raid was not a success.
     Recent newspaper articles on the Doolittle Raid tend to glorify and emphasize the bravery of the Doolittle Raiders. Much of this recent attention is due to the fact that the raid was nearing its sixtieth anniversary. In a 2002 article appearing in the Houston Chronicle, Jeff Wilkinson writes very nostalgically about the Doolittle Raiders and their contributions to the country.  He writes, “They lifted American fighting spirit when it was at its lowest ebb, giving the country hope for the long struggle ahead.”   Wilkinson tells the story of the Doolittle Raid in a way that expresses his appreciation, respect, and awe of their bravery.  He portrays the raiders as long shots who made significant contributions to American victory in the Pacific.  Agreeing with Merrill’s interpretation of the raid, Wilkinson portrays the amazing boost in morale the Doolittle Raid provided.  In a 2002 Boston Herald article, Tom Farmer also writes about the tremendous success of the Doolittle Raid.  Farmer depicts Doolittle and the raiders as national heroes and symbols of bravery.  In his view, the raid was successful in boosting morale, causing the Japanese to be more defensive, to hurry into the Battle of Midway.  This threefold success was highlighted by the raid’s ability to boost spirits and change the attitude of the American people. Farmer includes part of an interview with Doolittle Raider Royden Stork, which exemplifies his point that the Doolittle Raid provided a huge emotional lift to America.   In their articles, Wilkinson and Farmer repeat a great deal of the historiography on the Doolittle Raid.  Although they agree with Merrill’s interpretation about the primary effect of raid, they tend to mirror Glines’ glorification of the raid.
     Jichuan Wang expressed his concern about this type of glorification in a recent article in the Dayton Daily News.  He discusses the recent depictions of the raid, including the silver screen portrayal in Pearl Harbor. Recent articles and the movies have glorified the American bravery and success of the mission, but have failed to acknowledge the role of the Chinese. Wang asks the question, “What price did the Chinese pay for rescuing the American pilots?”    He refers to the fact that two hundred and fifty thousand Chinese were killed as a result of the raid, and compares this number to the under ten thousand Allied soldiers that were killed on D-Day.  The Chinese suffered greatly as a result of the Doolittle Raid, and Wang states that they should be given some credit. Wang also infers that the large number of Chinese casualties might suggest that the Doolittle Raid was not quite the success that it has been portrayed as in recent articles in movies. Recent history and articles on the Doolittle Raid have tended to place an increased significance on the bravery and impact of the Doolittle Raid. Wang’s article is a call to step back and analyze the larger picture of the historic Tokyo Raid.  Only time will tell how historians respond to this type of argument.  As the plight of the Chinese becomes better known, historians will surely pay more attention to their important role in the Doolittle Raid.
     The historiography of the Doolittle Raid has contributed different interpretations regarding the impact and legacy of the daring mission. Carroll Glines has provided the foundation for interpretation of the Doolittle Raid and has encouraged most historians in this field to consider the psychological effects of the mission. Important insight into the impact of the Doolittle Raid has come from historian John Dower.  In his book, War Without Mercy, Dower describes the strong hatred for the Japanese that appeared after Pearl Harbor.   The Japanese were viewed as evil, sneaky, conniving, primitive, and most of all “treacherous.”  These feelings continued to grow as Japan remained aggressive and on the attack.  As a result of Japan’s surprise attack at Pearl Harbor, Americans developed “a thirst for revenge” that the Japanese never anticipated.  Dower provides a powerful description of the climate that fostered the creation of the Doolittle Raid.  The American public, military leaders, and President Roosevelt called for revenge against the Japanese, and would not relent until this objective was achieved. Mixing Dower’s ideas with the philosophy of James Merrill produces an argument that will be the central focus of this paper.  The Doolittle Raid satisfied America’s need for revenge against the Japanese and provided a morale boost that propelled the United States to victory in the Pacific.