Example
Problem: Apparent and Absolute Magnitude
Example: A star has
apparent magnitude 6 and is 250 light-years from Earth.What is the star’s
absolute magnitude?
Distance
= 250 Lyrs x (1 parsec/3.3 Lyrs) = 75.75 pc
The
star is a whopping (OK, semi-whopping) 75.75 parsecs from Earth.So would it be
BRIGHTER or DIMMER if it were at 10 parsecs?
Of
course, it would be brighter.How many times brighter?Well, how many times
farther than 10 pc is the star?75.75/10 = 7.575.So it’s about seven and a half
times farther than 10 pc.Now here’s the “logic” part.We know that brightness
decreases as the SQUARE of the distance (something twice as far away is four times
dimmer).So if this star is 7.575 times farther away than it would be if it were
at 10 pc, it must be (7.575)2 = 57.3 times DIMMER than it would be
if it were at 10 pc.Put another way, it would be 57.3 times BRIGHTER if it were
at a distance of 10 pc instead of its actual distance of 75.75 pc.So what would
its magnitude be if it were at 10 pc (because its magnitude at 10 pc IS its
absolute magnitude)?
Well,
the star’s apparent magnitude is 6, so if it were closer (and therefore
brighter), its magnitude would have to be something LESS than 6 (remember,
smaller magnitudes mean brighter objects).But how many steps in magnitude would
it gain if it were 57.3 times brighter?
To
figure that out, you have to figure out how many magnitude steps equal a brightness
change of 57.3.And since each step in magnitude is a factor of 2.5 in
brightness, the question is this: how many times would I have to multiply 2.5
by itself to get 57.3?In other words, to what power would I have to raise 2.5
to get 57.3?
If
you’re so inclined, you can get a more-precise answer by trying half-magnitude
steps, or even tenth-magnitude steps (that is, raising 2.5 to the 4.1 power,
then 4.2 power, and so on, until you get close to 57.3).You should find that
the answer is something like 4.42 magnitude steps, so the star’s absolute
magnitude is 6 – 4.42 =1.58.
Right
about now, you’re probably saying to yourself, OK, this takes too much
thinking.What’s the mathematical approach?
So
here it is.There’s a parameter called the “distance modulus” or DM of a star
that is defined as simply the difference between the star’s apparent magnitude
and absolute magnitude.So
DM
= apparent magnitude – absolute magnitude
What
good is that?Well, the distance to any star is just 10 parsecs times 10 raised
to the power of DM/5.That’s right:
Distance
(pc) = 10 pc x 10DM/5
So
if you know the apparent and absolute magnitudes, you just subtract the
absolute from the apparent, divide by 5, raise 10 to that power, and multiply
by 10.And that’s the distance.
But
what if, as in this problem, you HAVE the distance but you don’t have one of
the magnitude values (the absolute magnitude in this case)?
No
problemo.Just use this form of the equation:
5
log10(Distance(pc)/10pc) = DM
where
log10 means “logarithm base 10.”
If you prefer, you can use
DM
= apparent magnitude – absolute magnitude = 5 log10(Distance(pc)/10pc)
So
for this problem, just move absolute magnitude to one side of the equation,
giving
Absolute
magnitude = apparent magnitude – 5 log10(Distance(pc)/10pc)
Plugging
in the numbers,
Absolute
magnitude = 6 – 5 log10(75.75/10) = 6 – 5 (0.879) = 1.6
Same
as we got the other way.Was this so bad?